The One CFL Rule That Still Confuses New Fans — Should It Be Changed?

the one CFL rule that still confuses new fans — should it be changed?

The Canadian Football League has always embraced its uniqueness. From a bigger field to 12 players a side, the CFL proudly stands apart from its American counterpart. But for many new fans, one rule in particular continues to cause confusion — the single point, more commonly known as the rouge.

For longtime CFL followers, the rouge is second nature. For newcomers, it often sparks the same reaction: How did they just score without scoring a touchdown or field goal?

what is the rouge, and why is it confusing?

A single point is awarded when the ball is kicked into the opponent’s end zone and is not returned out. This can happen on missed field goals, punts, or kickoffs. If the receiving team fails to advance the ball beyond the goal line, the kicking team is credited with one point.

To fans raised on NFL rules, this feels counterintuitive. In most football leagues, a missed field goal is simply a missed opportunity — not a scoring play. Seeing a team gain a point for a kick that didn’t go through the uprights often leaves new viewers puzzled.

why the CFL keeps it

Supporters of the rule argue that the rouge is a vital part of what makes the CFL exciting. It encourages aggressive play-calling, especially late in close games, and prevents teams from conceding field position without consequence.

The rule also places added value on special teams and returners. A single misstep can change the scoreboard, keeping games tense until the final seconds.

Historically, the rouge dates back to early forms of rugby football, making it one of the CFL’s most traditional elements.

the case for change

Critics believe the rule creates an unnecessary learning barrier for new fans — especially those tuning in from the NFL or international audiences. In an era where leagues are competing for attention, simplicity matters.

Some argue that awarding points for unsuccessful kicks feels illogical and undermines the idea that points should come from clear achievements. Others suggest modifying the rule rather than removing it entirely, such as limiting rouges to punts only or eliminating them on missed field goals.

should it be changed?

At its core, the debate reflects a larger question about the CFL’s identity. Is preserving tradition more important than making the game easier to understand for new audiences?

For now, the rouge remains — confusing, controversial, and undeniably Canadian. Whether it’s a rule that needs modernization or one that should be celebrated depends on who you ask. But one thing is certain: as long as it exists, it will continue to spark debate every season.